A granddaughter, a grandson, and a misplaced father.
How a Pedigree and Geoffrey of Monmouth corroborate the lost Northern Chronicle of Rhun ab Urien.
In my previous article I pointed out that there seems to have been a break in continuity within the line of succession for the late-5th century kingdom of Ebrauc.
This leads me to the conclusion that this is a fragment from a regnal list of Ebrauc itself, showing direct father-son transfer of power, except for Garbanian. It is unlikely that Garbanian’s interpolation is a mistake, as it seems quite deliberate, and it is also unlikely that it represents a missing generation, as it shifts all of the late 6th century figures out too far to be chronologically acceptable. The conclusion here is that Garbanian, potentially acting as high-king for a short time, may have ruled Ebrauc while Arthwys was young. This poises Arthwys to act as Garbanian’s Penteulu, fighting ‘cum regibus Brittonum’.
Arthur Pen(teulu)dragon
In Andrew Breeze’s latest book looking at the historical Arthur he makes note that in the earliest discussions of Arthur he is not called a king.Coeling Chronicler is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Coeling Chronicler to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.