Was Arthur a king? A war-leader? Both?
Interesting, I see some parallels here between Arthur and Syagrius , who was also referred as a King by Gregory of Tours, but whether he actually took that title or continued to title himself using the old Roman offices is a matter of debate.
Interesting, I see some parallels here between Arthur and Syagrius , who was also referred as a King by Gregory of Tours, but whether he actually took that title or continued to title himself using the old Roman offices is a matter of debate.